Sunday, June 30, 2013

Parents, Students and Manufactured Apathy


As a candidate for political office one of my greatest challenges was the level of political apathy shown by many voters, particularly those in urban areas.  The commonly held idea that “those” folks gonna do what they gonna do, so it doesn’t matter if I vote or not stuck in my craw like no other sentiment shared along my political walk.  However, in the space of public education that mantra seems to hold true like no other.

Case in point and I am sure this is played out across the country in many other urban communities and school systems my alma mater is now in the mist of receiving its 3rd principal in 3 years.  That means since the 9th grade the upcoming class of 11th graders have had a new instructional leader ever year since they started high school. All often times under guise of “school improvement.”  Couple this with the carousel of teachers that come and go in urban schools and you have a revolving door that’s reflective of the many teenage girls hairstyles. 

Without a doubt I am for whatever it takes to help students achieve and reach their full potential.  I do however; question the logic when schools reflect the unstable social environment many of these students come from.  It is my personal belief that part of what makes ALL environments whether its schools or work successful is consistent leadership at the top.  That consistent leadership at the top offers students in particular those from volatile environments an opportunity to know that at least for a while you know where you can go and someone knows your story.  It is further my belief that knowing a student, his family or his/her environmental story allows for accountability to develop based upon the fact “I SEE YOU.”  Inconsistent leadership oftentimes based upon over reliance of test data that has a huge level of skepticism in urban communities sends a message to those same communities and those same students that “WE” gone do what “WE” gone do and “YOU” can’t do anything about it.

Finally, what this inconsistency at the top leads to is a level of apathy that impacts parental and political involvement based upon lack of influence in any decision making process.  Not only does apathy impact parents, but I would offer it impacts student achievement as well.  Students by in large want to do well for people they know care about them and their story and that takes time.   Schools and student development are no different than any other human relationship (think 90 Day Rule).  However, when it comes to urban schools that relational development and its impact on student achievement seems to have more contingencies than true “economic recovery.” Thus leaving schools like every other institution within urban communities filled with nameless faces and irrelevant stories that do not impact the bottom line. 


That’s My Truth and I AM Sticking to It…

As I hit the customer service bell and scream NEXT...

Dr. Irvin PeDro Cohen

Thursday, June 27, 2013

From Dr. Dre to Paula Deen and the N-Word In Between


I like thousands of other people find Paula Deen’s words deplorable.  One would think that someone who has made a living much less an empire on the culinary skills created by African-American’s would be at least slightly socially conscious when it comes to the words that come out of their mouth.  However, the impact of her need I say social faux pas is much less impactful to me for several reasons than Dr. Dre. 

First, I never have not nor do I plan on visiting her restaurant.  Not because I don’t care for the food, but because I am a vegetarian.  And the one thing I do know is southern cuisine is not built for those of us who find delectable delight in tofu and vegetables.  There is something unappealing to me about items drizzled in bacon.

Secondly and probably more important to me is the line that has been a continuous part of the Paula Deen culinary experience since her sudden celebrity status.  I never understood nor appreciated the patience people show to stand in lines sometimes for hours to spend their money.  Call me impatient, but if I have to wait longer than 45 minutes to eat at a restaurant then it is time for Plan B. 

That being said the actions of Dr. Dre are far more impactful to me and I find much more egregious simply for their social impact.  For those who are reading this and unaware Dr. Dre recently gifted the University of Southern California $35,000,000.00. 

My issue is this Dre made millions on the backs of young African-American and Hispanic kids who purchased his records long before it was fashionable for young suburban white kids to own hip hop records.  It was those same kids who espoused to live the often times fictions gangster life that is talked about in Dre’s work.  Furthermore, it those very same kids that when they can’t get into USC (19% African-American and Hispanic enrollment) or any other SC for that matter they find themselves at the doors of HBCU’s or other minority serving institutions.  Who subsequently mold them into being real doctors and lawyers, etc. 

This is not to say Dr. Dre can’t spend HIS money as he sees fit, I simply find his actions more harmful to the outcomes of African-Americans than Paula Deen’s words.  Dre’s lyrics have consequences that have had a lasting impact on the collective consciousness of millions of young African-Americans and Hispanics and have thus created a culture that finds value in their prison experience, their over sexualized behavior and their out of control drug use. 

Finally, while Paula Deen words may hurt Dre’s actions hurt worse because not only does he call African-American’s the N word, but he also spends his money to make other communities better in the process.

Therefore, no Paula Deen for me and no Beats by Dre for my nephews.

That’s my Truth and I AM sticking to it…

I AM
Dr. Irvin PeDro Cohen


Sunday, March 10, 2013

A Change is Coming

The study of gentrification has typically focused on the displacement of existing populations through rising housing cost.  However, based upon which end of the economic paradigm you are on gentrification can now be considered “urban renaissance.”  That withstanding the social profile of most gentrifiers is usually white, middle class to affluent married couples with either no families or very young children (DeSena & Ansalone, 2009).  Although, the social justification is often times the disruption of the concentration of poverty those that are typically impacted are mainly African-American and Latino families (Lipman, 2009). Furthermore, according to Katz (2000) it is this ethnic group that is typically identified with having the least political influence. 

An ecological examination of the communities that are typically targeted for gentrification or this new “urban renaissance” would suggest a lack of infrastructure, high concentrations of poverty and a social pathology that reflects a lack of focus on education as a means of social mobility.  Therefore, it would stand to reason that a process in which a sense of social leveling would be welcomed.  Lipman (2009) classified the ideology of gentrification as one where middle class families would replace significant portions of low-income families thus exposing those that remain behind to better values and an achievement ethic as well as better schools, teachers and resources.   James Ryan (2010) went further in his book Five-Miles Away, A World Apart to suggest that the key to closing the achievement gap lie within the influence of order, rigor and achievement found in the middle class.

Proponents of gentrificaction or “urban renaissance” tout the socially and economically diverse communities and schools that come about as neighborhoods begin to revitalize.  They also tout a more positive attitude toward education and educational outcomes as the middle class influence starts to set in.  Proponents also suggest parents who typically did not have any leverage develop a sense of power to advocate for themselves and their children and subsequently academic achievement becomes the norm.  Finally, as achievement becomes common the preverbal achievement gap disappears within the neighboring schools (Wax, 2011).

Opponents on the other had suggested the idea of mixed income neighborhoods is the catalyst for gentrification, further disenfranchising an already isolated social group. Opponents also suggest that urban minorities who are lucky enough to find themselves in the “rebranded” schools face social isolation based upon their economic status (Wax, 2011).  However, very little attention is paid to the students who are displaced based upon the changing dynamics of the new “neighborhood” school.  Another point opponents of gentrification or “urban renaissance” raise is that urban schools in African-American and Latino neighborhoods represent a complicated social dynamic where community and caring often prevail even in the face of uncaring teachers and inadequate resources (Lipman, 2009).  Thus giving further credence to the African proverb that “It takes a village to raise a child.”

Finally, and the most obvious and least discussed is that gentrification or “urban renaissance” overlooks the history of neglect on core city neighborhoods that created the negative circumstances by which the children of poor and low-income families find themselves in.   Gentrification further highlights the spatial inequality, displacement, hopelessness and racial containment that often beget many of the families and children that live in inner cities throughout the country (Lipman, 2009).  However, for the middle class and affluent benefactor gentrification represents a windfall opportunity not only from a financial standpoint, but it also represents significant educational opportunities for the children of those that have the financial wherewithal.  DeSena and Ansalone (2009) concluded the aforementioned through their informal strategies of negotiating and navigating as well as their political influence have managed to secure urban schools as agents of neighborhood transformation by attracting likeminded residents.  However, very little attention is paid to those that are displaced and where they go from here.

That’s my Truth and I AM sticking to it.


I AM
Dr. Irvin PeDro Cohen

References
DeSena, J.N. & Ansalone, G. (2009).  Gentrification, Schooling and Social Inequality, Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp 60 – 74.

Katz, B. (2000).  Enough of the Small Stuff Toward a New Urban Agenda, The Brookings Review, Spring, pp 6-11.

Lipman, P. (2009).  The Cultural Politics of Mixed-Income Schools and Housing: A Racialized Discourse of Displacement, Exclusion and Control, Anthropology and Educational Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp 215 – 236.

Wax, A. L. (2011).  Income Integration at School, Policy Review, pp. 49 – 62.

Friday, February 22, 2013

Race, Racism and the Race Exhibit

As a young African-American growing up on the Northside of Jacksonville you are keenly aware of race and racism.  Matter of fact I would go as far as saying it’s ingrained in your DNA from the moment you are born.  You are taught to recognize and acknowledge both structural and institutional racism from birth.  There are countless lessons my parents taught me regarding race and racism that have served me well till this day.  

Therefore, when I went to a recent exhibit at the Museum of Science and History that dealt with race and how much we are alike I went with less of a critical eye toward racism and with one trained on the intellectualism of the exhibit.  Now as a scholar I am keenly aware of the fact you cannot separate race from racism the two are constructs of each other.  However, that was not the purpose of the exhibit. 

The purpose of the exhibit was to scientifically show how the constricts of skin color can give a false sense of difference when if you look beyond that we are all quite similar.  Matter of fact if you peel back the layers according to research humans are 99.9 percent the same genetically.  As I said previously I went to the exhibit to sharpen my “intellectual,” skills, nowadays I find greater value in that rather than pointing out the obvious. 

I guarantee you Bill Gates, Phil Knight and the countless other billionaires of the world don’t consider race much when moving their products.  Race is an obsession amongst those who don’t have the economic wherewithal to see beyond last week’s paycheck. Therefore, we spend an exhaustible amount of time having conversations about both race and racism while those at the tippy top of the economic pyramid laugh all the way to the bank.   

It is my personal belief as well that the conversation regarding things we as “humans” have in common are more beneficial to my efforts of serving the poor and marginalized and moving the larger concept of humanity forward.  I gain nothing nor do the people of New Town (where I work) or Brentwood (where I live) by replaying conversations of race over and over again.  However, it is my responsibility to point out instances of racism when it does exist and sometimes that means with folks that look like me.  May I suggest Dr. Jeffri Ann Wilder’s work on colorism if you don’t think Black folk can be racist.

I find greater value and much more productivity in having conversations around classism rather than race, because it is class rather than race that’s the greatest impediment to success, in particular African-American success.  Class has not only destroyed the African-American community, but it consistently allows folks passes based upon the fact they are simply African-American.   Maybe that’s why Cornel West doesn’t get invited to the White House and we refuse to acknowledge the growing wage and income gap. 

Finally, let me share my thoughts on The 10 Things Black People Should Do Now as food for thought (http://irvincohen.com/blog1/2011/02/16/hello-worldhttp://irvincohen.com/blog1/2011/02/16/hello-world)

That’s My Story and I AM Sticking To It…

I AM

Dr. Irvin PeDro Cohen  

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The Epidemiology of Poverty


While battling the flu over the last couple of weeks it forced me if nothing more to spend some time with my thoughts and one of the thoughts that seem to just keep finding itself at the forefront of my mind was my belief in the epidemiology of poverty.  What I mean by this is that like cancer and sickle cell, poverty in and of itself is a disease and when someone is affected they tend to show signs that are just as obvious as weight loss or lack of energy or any other obvious manifestation that the body is at a state of imbalance.  

It is my personal belief that there is a fundamental difference between being poor and being affected with the disease of poverty.  We can collectively agree that we know or even ourselves may be poor meaning we are lacking some economic resources that if only we had access to could change the trajectory of our life.  However, those that are affected with the disease of poverty no matter if they had economic resources it would only mask an ill state of well-being similar to the way pharmaceuticals mask larger disease states. 
 
It is further my belief that for those of us who work with challenged populations particularly in the educational or social service space we see signs of poverty’s disease state earlier than most.  However, most of us are NOT trained to see it with a medicinal eye rather we are taught to see it with an eye toward the sociological implications.  Therefore, forcing us to treat outcomes rather than defend against symptoms. 
 
The disease state of poverty impacts everything from belief systems to value judgments and in its most sever state it can manifest itself into debilitating anger, which the medical research is clear regarding prolonged anger and its effect on the body and health outcomes.  However, what my experience has led me to find most interesting regarding the epidemiology of poverty is how much of the disease is dictated by entertainment or visual untruths.  

The proliferation of “reality TV” paired with an instantaneous, conspicuous consumerism and a you owe me culture has created a behavior pattern, in particular amongst people who are struggling economically that ultimately leads to a disease state of poverty.  As I stated earlier not only does it impact judgment, but it often leads to a decision making process that is not functional in the “real world.”  Therefore, you have Basketball Wives, who are not real wives and have no discernible skill other than being a jump off and a bill to some NBA player, whose only economic value is tied to his ability to play to ball and we all know how that turns out for some in the long term.

Finally, this is not to suggest that there is not an economic consequence to being poor.  It is to suggest however, that being poor does not mean you are or will ultimately be subjected to the disease of poverty.  

This is my truth and I AM sticking to it…
Irvin PeDro Cohen

Sunday, January 6, 2013

To Be or Not To Be

Today I would like to talk from the topic of To Be Or Not to Be.

As a historical reference the phrases To Be Or Not to Be is part of a line in the Shakespeare play Hamlet and it simply means is it better to live or die?  And when I thought about what I would say to you all and reflecting on some of the young people that I have known and still know who_____ was part of their education I thought that was a valid question. 

Now before some of you go and get all squeamish on me I AM not talking about the actual act of flat lining, although that’s what the original author was talking about I Am simply asking the question of To Be or Not to Be based on the time of year we are in.  8 days ago many of you in this room like countless other folks celebrated the start of a New Year and you made a few resolutions.  If you are overweight you made the resolution to lose weight.  If you are a part of the audience you may have made a commitment to graduate from ____ this year and someone of you it is not lost on me may have made a commitment to stop drinking or smoking or some of you may have made a commitment to do both, but nonetheless you made a commitment To Be or Not to Be.

The good part about whatever your commitment was you made a commitment, because it is not lost upon me nor should it be lost upon you that there are people in our existence who only commitment is simply to get by another day.  Now I have to be honest when I am asked to make speeches to audiences like you all I sometimes say or even suggest that your presence in the building much less in a seat is enough, but if I told you that simply being here was enough I would be lying to you because as I said earlier when Shakespeare wrote the words To Be or Not to Be he was talking about living and dying and many of you prior to making a decision to come to____ were breathing, which meant your were living, but you were actually dying.  You were walking around just like everyone else, but the decisions you made or were making simply said that you were trying to if I was Italian I would say whack yourself and if I were on my porch I would say murk yourself.  All of your conscious actions were saying I want to die. 

But by virtue of you being here today in your right mind and body it says that through all your efforts someone or something more powerful than you has a plan for your life.

Now being the guy that I am and having a firm commitment to the generation that will have to take care of me at some point I want to give you a three of things because of time that I think will help you in your quest To Be.

    1. Make a commitment to something and because you are here I am going to assume        you are being prepared to do exactly that.  As part of that commitment to do something make every day a learning experience.  The people here at___ get paid to teach you and prepare you for industry.  Therefore, do not let a day go by where they get paid for not doing their job and I assure you disciplining you is NOT part of their job.
2.         Once you make a commitment to do something go hard or go home.  The worse thing you can do is waste space being just OK.  There is no such thing as an overnight sensation or having it easy.  Its called the road less traveled for a reason and only those who have made a commitment to going hard truly enjoy the fruits of their labor and have sustainable success.

3.         Lastly, make a commitment to serve.  Life is truly a quid pro quo system.  You have to give something in order to get something and if you still don’t get it you have to make deposits in order to make withdrawals.  The Bank of Life simply works that way and I know that at the end of the day we all have something we can simply share with the larger human family, but we have to start with people close to us. 

Matter of fact I suggest commit random acts of kindness.       

With that being said I will take my seat with the hope you have made a decision To Be more so than Not to Be meaning I hope you have you have made a decision to truly live than visibly dying.

Carpe Diem meaning seize the day...

Namesake and thank you for having me…

I AM Dr. Irvin PeDro Cohen

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Don't Shoot Me

The recent violence at Sandy Hook Elementary impacted me in a couple of ways first and foremost the community’s name was New Town and secondly my New Town had been impacted by gun violence earlier that week.  While I am glad to say no one was killed on my end the impact from gun violence was nonetheless all the same. 

I am no gun owner; quite frankly I never saw the need to own one myself.  Needless to say I don’t own a pit bull, firecrackers or any hazardous materials either and personally I am happy and whole just the same.  I said that to say while I have a hefty respect for others to own guns ownership should not put everyone at risk.  Communities, in particular children deserve the benefit of the doubt when it comes to being able to live healthy and whole lives free of random shootings at the hands of gun owners legal or illegal.  While the death of innocent children is a collective tragedy, so is the shooting of 5 people in the New Town Success Zone and 10 people both Saturday and Sunday in Chicago, Jordan Davis and Trayvon Martin. 

Finally, violence, in particular gun violence does not have to be the norm for any of us and it should not take the death of innocent children to force us to have a substantive conversation about it.  If you feel your personal safety is that much at risk that you feel compelled to arm yourself maybe you should stop and look in the mirror and ask yourself why am I so at risk compared to the countless other people who don’t carry a gun? 

This is my truth and I AM sticking to it…

Irvin PeDro Cohen